Gibbs’ Article on Palin

Nancy Gibbs of TIME defined Sarah Palin as ‘The Technicolor Rorschach Test’, i.e., ‘has a way of talking that leaves people unclear about what she said but certain about what she meant’. (seems like flattery doesn’t it?)
Her article touches on this question: Why did Palin quit? She then gives a hint:: In a Census Bureau survey, 86% of women cited the push of a hostile or inflexible workplace as their reason for leaving their jobs. Then: ‘…it’s important to note that Palin never said she was leaving office to spend more time with her children.’ But Palin also said: ”I’m not a quitter, I’m a fighter.” (Which do you think is more obvious?)
My take: If Palin quit her job for her children’s sake, praise her. Too many children’s lives were already broken because of unavailable mothers. Isn’t that obvious in her case?

Advertisements

About DigitalPlato

Poch is a Bookrix author and a freelance writer. He is a frequent contributor to TED Conversations.
This entry was posted in Politics, Society and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

What do you think?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s